Selling of fake products is bad but there is no stopping it. Especially on some outrageous brands that sell original items for thousands of dollars so the people who can make the products do it because it can make them easy money and there will easily is plenty of business. So many people will know what they are buying is fake but it is a look alike they will get the same kind of glory or fame as they might get from having the real one.
Moving on up to global and how huge these factories and head honchos can go with what they know what to do. It absolutely corrupts everyone it touches once you are in you are stuck there and all you want to do is buy more because it is convenient. Big players get involved such as senators, presidents, governors, and such because they see the money and they want in and they have the sources to help improve these factories do better, that is why they want the big players to join they for the protection.
I though the movie was good I have never really seen people walk through markets and get picked to go shopping in a black market. I am sure it happens very often and there are probably people who shop at black markets or these cheaper markets rather than even looking in the direction of the original provider. How they have to get rid of money I don’t see how it is dirty money yes it is a dirty business but who is going to know where you got your money or why you pay everything in cash. I think it is a easy business to make a profit in that’s why so many people get involved.

Case Progress

My case progress is going well I think I just have not started. I have done a couple of hours of research all online I would know if they would have published books on Supreme Court cases maybe some of the more famous cases. I have many links to choose from and at least half of them should be reliable and half of those I will actually use. I still need to do more research but I believe I will have a great start on this final even though I haven’t started the first part and it is now past due I still have a great feeling that I am going to do just fine.
What I plan on doing with the fifteen hundred word essay I think it would be best to have it broken up into the seven parts and each part having roughly about two hundred words and one of the seven parts will be about three hundred words. Two hundred words does not seem like much to cover each section especially when it is filled with two or three quotes that could take up half of the paragraph. I have a lot planned for the project and I won’t fall behind for sure and catch up shouldn’t be too hard though it probably will not be in today but tomorrow it will most likely be posted.

rights of landlord

My rights as a property owner I believe are basically if my tenant pays and keeps the noise down for respect of the other residents and does cause damage to the room then I am fine I don’t bother him until the rent is due. If anything the tenant does offends me or distrupts the other residents then I take steps to search out the problem and attempt to fix it, if I can’t fix the problem and it continues then next step for me is to bring in the authorizes, and if they can’t do anything to help me then I talk to a lawyer about this problem and also with the police officer and any questions about laws that might stop me from kicking out this rude tenant. Then kick this guy or residents out of the house and say good ridence to them. It really should be that simple as the owner doesn’t like someone they should have the right to not allow them to stay in their home it is their property. If he will absolutely not leave then I will take the residedents to court and file as many charges against the residents and hope most hit them hard. If it turns out that I had done something wrong and broke some of the residents then whatever get up, dust off your pants and try again.
I do not know the rights that the owner would have on his house but it would be smart of him to have a general idea of these rules for what he can and cannot do. The owner should really be careful of scandals that might destroy his business or cause him to go crazy. The owner I believe should have strong rights as to what can go on throughout his home so he can settle disputes.

Greed is Good EOC

Greed is Good

We cannot deny that greed is good. It brings competition throughout business. Being the consumer we are greedy in the way of looking for a compromise between cheaper prices but also looking for a great quality for the price. Americans are lucky we get dozens of choices to choose from, though we may be looking for one item like shampoo we get to choose from the Walmart that might be a few blocks away, or a Target, and more smaller stores I pretty sure you can think of. Thanks for those greedy business men they want our money so badly in order to compete with the other dozen stores which might be placed in the same plaza they must lower prices, deal with great customer service and other nonsense that make us, the consumer, happy. Yay us!

The great down fall for those small businesses that try to make a name for themself have to compete with the greats. Meaning it’s not that they do not try hard enough but it could be that the new small businesses have no chance of competing with the big leaguers. When the big leaguers start to slide what are they to do but cut their expenses somewhere and most will take it from their work force or benefits that they might have but is that fair. I would say it is fair I rather have some benefits cut then my job lost or other employees getting laid off because wants to keep some of us safe but it has always be up to management to solve the problem so how each company works it is their business.

I know nothing of wall street or stocks all I know is buy when they are cheap, keep when your down, sell when there is profit to be made.

I agree with what the court had ruled. A student was at a school event and he made a banner to show. I do not know how else this banner could have been interpreted any other way other than promoting drug use. The boy, Friedrich, banner clearly stated “Bong Hits for Jesus”. Bong hits clearly displays the use of drugs and the use of drugs for any cause whether good or bad still requires the use of drugs, which is against law. I don’t know why the boy would even bring it up at a school function and what point he was trying to get across as the meaning of his banner.

The argument between the teacher, Morse, and the boy, Friedrich, was Friedrich felt that his 1st amendment right was abused because Morse had confiscated his banner from him and was not able to express himself following the event he was also suspended for displaying the banner at a school campus.

What I do not get is the only point having Friedrich’s constitutional right violated and let off the hook was that he was at a school event. Since he was at a school event with teachers supervising the teachers were allowed to confiscate his banner and restrict him from speaking because he may have been promoting but if he had been anywhere else it would have been perfectly fine for him to do what he did.

All I have to say is why do people always think they have a right to do whatever they want or a right to do get away with anything they do. We were all given a brain and a mouth that shuts why don’t we try to think a little more and talk a little less.

crimes and torts

Bribery- CrimeIllegal Gambling- CrimeIllegally tampering with evidence- CrimeFake contract- TortVandalism- TortPurgery- CrimeSexual harassment- TortUnder aged driving- CrimeNo seatbelts- CrimeVehicles not registered- CrimeAssault- TortUnlicensed driving- CrimePossession of firearms- CrimeSpeeding- CrimeReckless driving- CrimeReefer- CrimeEvading arrest-CrimeLittering- Crime

TEAM: Robin, Alex, Christine, Art

comments to others

Comments
To: http://websitedivisions.blogspot.com/
True that laws are meant to protect and the reason i mainly think that the reason americans turn so badly against gun laws whether to restrict or allow is because we are americans and we like to stretch our right to talk and come up with any reason to argue just for argueing. Americans really do not like change. We are a sue happy country some people really do not care what happens to others. The thing about Switzerland is the gun tolerance there is part of their culture just like in Amsterdam and their young drinking age and its americans who cause the most troubles in other countries.You made your point clear at the top of the page how our system is corrupt but I lose you throughout the rest of the paper of your reasons why it is corrupted. I think it is becuase you have to many examples and your examples aren't proving your point.
To: http://trindaddy.blogspot.com/
I don't think we would need a new branch of government because just forming that would go against the constitution. It would probably take years just to form this um I don't even know what to call this law checking group. Who would be brought into this group and would they have to be elected into office. Besides that I believe it is the judicial branch purpose is to enforce the law and maybe they should make their own division and refine and interpret these laws.

I do agree that the law is a great thing and most make sense and are for the good and few are just plain dumb your blog is well written and your view is easily readable.

What I think about the law

I think the law is a mandatory thing to make a society to be known as civilized. What is the law but men coming up with reasons to keep control of the masses and keep them from revolt or doing anything stupid such as murders and starting fires. If we didn’t have police officers would it still only be the ‘bad people” stealing or people knocking off other people every time someone pissed them off or was just having a bad day. Another point would be there would still be an alpha male either controlling by fear or by respect. Wouldn’t you prefer to have chosen someone who can take the lead of the group or by the only person who has the gun or higher power and he takes the lead because no one is willing to stand up?

How laws can be passed can be really difficult, I believe it is too difficult. The law, government and congress are all difficult subjects to deal with or amend. With America we like a majority rule, well I think that’s a great idea but it should be a high majority at least forty percent of the civilization if there are more than two candidates to take the leadership. Same thing goes for passing bills but it’s more like seventy percent of the voters which is incredibly difficult because there are always two side of every story. Now at times the law or government can seem very dumb or the interpretation of a law is nothing close to what I or you might interpret.

I still strongly believe that the law can stimulate people with fear of consequence and that we actually need laws because one will always affect us and that’s gravity. Since we live in nature and nature has her laws of her own it makes sense for us to have our own. The law helps and everyone should be able to see that. If you can’t sorry you still have to live with and you’re only going to make your life feel worst.

What I think about Lawyers

The thing about lawyers is they have a possibility to gain a huge income from one client because of the average cost for a lawyer. A forty percent fee on average I just have to say “unbelievable” but what do they do to deserve such an income. Lawyers understand the law and defend their client my main question is what do lawyers go through to win a case to earn such a large gross pay.

I personally think they don’t work hard at all, if any work that needs to be done would be pushed on some of their lackeys who do not present well in court. What research do they go through, how many hours spent, is any sleep lost, do they feel stressed during these times, who else gets a cut of the pay, do they receive full pay, does anyone else help with any problems or struggles these lawyers may go through. If they do go through struggles, have stress about the case, or go a day without sleep do lawyers still deserve to take forty percent of the client’s profits if their side wins. Even if the client does not win the trial does the lawyer still get paid something for his time I would assume, yes lawyers would still receive compensation.

I have no idea what to think about lawyers about whether they work hard or are lazy, or if they should work for a known guilty person. Who I am to say lawyers should only defend the good side they might have families to feed and the defendants they have are for sure guilty. I still have many questions about lawyer’s about work studies, stress life, moral beliefs whether or not to defend the good guy or which is the good guy.